Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:29:21 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <xn0oonrmyb7rmfy003@reader443.eternal-september.org>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org> <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net> <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v7olct$18l87$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:29:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11bf46ddd0e905da97e6f9933c811d93";
	logging-data="1361054"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+7yYOCJprjEFVJMukg/5jdPLPdszkZGz4="
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.372 (x86; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:naVUbJ+RBLAw4b8spRsskhgrFKo=
X-Face: 09>j%-W3HnyolA\I${DXfUw}~nKyLDiU8IwUVM'`
X-Ref: reader443.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00002C09
Bytes: 2739

Alan wrote:

>On 2024-07-23 09:21, badgolferman wrote:
>>Jolly Roger wrote:
>>
>>>On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>On 2024-07-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Apple declined to comment on the NSPCC's accusation, instead
>>>>>>pointing  The Guardian to a statement it made when it
>>>>>>shelved the  CSAM scanning  plan.  Apple said it opted for
>>>>>>a different strategy  that “prioritizes  the security and
>>>>>>privacy of [its] users.” The  company told Wired in  August
>>>>>>2022 that "children can be protected  without companies
>>>>>>combing  through personal data."
>>>>>
>>>>>This is one reason many people choose Apple over alternatives.
>>>>
>>>>iPhone.  The preferred mobile device of child molestors.
>>>>
>>>>This could be a new marketing ploy someday!
>>>
>>>Privacy for everyone is important.
>>
>>Sorry, I can't agree with that.  Some people give up their right to
>>privacy when they harm others or society.  The laws are there for
>>everyone, not just those who choose to follow them.
>
>He said it poorly, but "privacy for everyone" IS important in that
>when you create a system that purports only to take privacy away from
>the bad actors, you are really taking it away from everyone.


If you're on the internet there is no pretense of privacy.