| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<xn0ooqy9sbi95j1001@news.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Google Gemini reviews doctor Who - Destiny of the Daleks
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:00:00 +0100
Organization: Eternal-September
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <xn0ooqy9sbi95j1001@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <v7tl6i$1f7q$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0ooqwpobg57uq003@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:00:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="56977ed9346aa96a4b96bbdbf97bbeb6";
logging-data="2562234"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FbkQSEVLqWre5w8l53Yng"
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uhPvYKf09dSjgjurzq7xJmIXoiI=
X-Ref: news.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00000B17
X-Face: "%,CLLw+;\t#ytLlWP0h4~#'EX.l{<Mu;Rc-MNd)+|Ru0:##TaO.;z~6BMqh|4=.6%UVy;E&'Dl}awS.?%!tWj1Fs\-J/)<S[AWij4]qs[K{6H}tC<pGg?D)_gplS[3'y2H2Rf?%CPNMbin}[z[xa96yi4mK{(?&nM%1D,M
Bytes: 1870
Blueshirt wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
> > Rating: 5.5 out of 10
>
> That's being generous. I'd go 3/5 on a good day.
That should be 3/10 obviously... on a good day!
> > Would you like to discuss any specific aspects of the story
> > in more detail?
>
> No, we don't need detail... it was rubbish will suffice!
>
> "Destiny of the Daleks" was the worst Dalek story of the
> 1970's. (IMO obviously!)
And on reflection I'll add the 1980's in to that as well.
However, it was a close-run with Resurrection... Tegan leaving
for good tipped the scales in that story's direction!