Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Piece of shit iOS has absolutely zero privacy for God's sake
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 19:17:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <xn0otm8m83avzzc005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
References: <vhgjd5$2ta1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vhgmdl$1gf32$1@dont-email.me> <e63%O.77978$7Lh8.40536@usenetxs.com> <bp4%O.29316$vojd.11372@fx11.iad> <ST2dnRvcS5gpyqD6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vhqcdh$2sl5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <xn0otm6n7386d3r004@reader443.eternal-september.org> <vhqjh6$23ed$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:17:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c8493c34690ba00e8d757fd1097efbb4";
	logging-data="1383914"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Ii6dYfKSwFxYXOcbmvqtS1p+2UttMb+4="
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.372 (x86; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XDCoTUKnhvS/FJD32zkRJQyFLJk=
X-Face: 09>j%-W3HnyolA\I${DXfUw}~nKyLDiU8IwUVM'`
X-Ref: reader443.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00002CF5
Bytes: 4866

Andrew wrote:

>badgolferman wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:01:08 -0000 (UTC) :
>
>>>We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as
>>>you refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
>>>Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start
>>>to become normal again
>> 
>> I'd have to excuse Chris from that list.  He seems far more
>>reasonable  than the rest of the hive.
>
>I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of
>the hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd
>put them into these loose groupings of similar personalities when
>posting here.
>
>
>Jolly Roger === Lewis
>Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
>Haemactylus === Your Name
>Alan Browne === Chris
>nospam === he is in a category of his own
>
>The reason nospam is in his own category is that he actually knew far
>more about Apple devices than the rest of the Apple trolls did, even
>as if we took him at face value - we would conclude he knew nothing -
>but he was simply denying everything that Apple didn't do as not
>needed & not wanted.
>
>Alan Browne and Chris are together in a category as they can actually
>think for themselves (e.g., Alan Browne loves to quote Apple white
>papers, and Alan Browne came up with his own analogy that the
>walled-garden restrictions are an elite "clubhouse" that you have to
>pay dearly to be admitted to). Likewise, Chris can discuss some
>things on an adult level.
>
>Haemactylus & Your Name can't discuss anything at an adult level, and
>neither can Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz but the category differences
>are that the latter two post frequently to this ng while the former
>two do not, and, what Haemactylus & Your Name post is drivel never
>related to the topic.
>
>Not that Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz don't post drivel - the difference
>being Alan & Joerg have no purpose for posting other than for their
>own amusement.
>
>When it comes to the king of Apple trolls though (now that nospam's
>contract ran out) is Jolly Roger, who has been posting to this
>newsgroup for at least as long as I have and who is the classic
>epitome of the Apple troll.
>
>To Jolly Roger, anything that is NOT a cheering squad for the Apple
>troll team, is something to be reviled. Detested to the level that
>Jolly Roger hurls vicious yet childish "your mother is a slut" type
>of inane childish vindictives (as he's a fifth-grade sadistic bully
>in all ways possible).
>
>As for nospam... he was perhaps the most despicable of these Apple
>trolls, in that he brazenly lied to everyone to their face without
>any qualms.
>
>Where we can lump both Jolly Roger & nospam is they are both sadistic
>completely unprepossessing human beings whose very existence proves
>that such evil people who possess no human value can be so horrible
>to those that do simply because they have been told their entire
>lives that they're stupid - and they want to get back at everyone
>else for doing that to them.
>
>Do you think I have them better pegged appropriately enough yet with
>those clarifying distinctions above?


Maybe Chris should be in his own category.  Anyone who can see through
Jolly Roger's bullshit and calls him out for it is okay with me.

-- 
"How can I lose to such an idiot?" ~ A shout from chess grandmaster
Aaron Nimzovich