Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <yAk4OJbMOSUZGjPAlkMeNJxyhJM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v76e49$1cn1q$1@dont-email.me> <xLBGlqr9FmVi45Mlcw6nJbdFqqM@jntp>
 <v76hh2$1d5jc$2@dont-email.me> <MINhbylBZhXuFEEVBuuOVNQAhME@jntp> <v78vh4$1u5pb$2@dont-email.me>
 <KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp> <v7bqlv$2ie0l$1@dont-email.me> <c-PkYK_utOa8WeI_M5VOpKpj9Bk@jntp>
 <v7edc8$3453q$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: vKRPfpqRL5iffbXYmr2bCqWpqQ4
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=yAk4OJbMOSUZGjPAlkMeNJxyhJM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 24 19:34:45 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-19T19:34:45Z/8955506"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 2657
Lines: 48

Le 19/07/2024 à 21:04, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

> The time to go around the loop is measured to be ≈ 90 μs

 Yes.

> You claim the proton will go around the loop in ≈ 13 ns

 Absolutely. 

> Please explain again why a clock on the circuit can't
> measure the time between each time the proton passes it,
> but only can measure the time between each time the 6933th
> proton passes it.

 Non, je refuse.

 Je ne suis pas un chien qui doit sans cesse tout ré-expliquer.

 Il faut au moins que le lecteur fasse l'effort de lire et de comprendre 
ce qui est dit.

 Seulement après, il peut être utile en critiquant ce qu'il a compris.

 
> 
> It is something about time dilation, isn't it ?
> And something about that the single clock really is two
> clocks fused into one, right?
> 
>> 
>> Please stop.
> 
> Nope. This is fun!

 I don't think so. 

> The result is that I know SR quite well.

 It's what I said.

 Paul B.Andersen know SR quite well.

 But he can't understand that doctor Hachel say, because he speak 
different. 

 R.H.