| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<yAk4OJbMOSUZGjPAlkMeNJxyhJM@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <yAk4OJbMOSUZGjPAlkMeNJxyhJM@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v76e49$1cn1q$1@dont-email.me> <xLBGlqr9FmVi45Mlcw6nJbdFqqM@jntp> <v76hh2$1d5jc$2@dont-email.me> <MINhbylBZhXuFEEVBuuOVNQAhME@jntp> <v78vh4$1u5pb$2@dont-email.me> <KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp> <v7bqlv$2ie0l$1@dont-email.me> <c-PkYK_utOa8WeI_M5VOpKpj9Bk@jntp> <v7edc8$3453q$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: vKRPfpqRL5iffbXYmr2bCqWpqQ4 JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=yAk4OJbMOSUZGjPAlkMeNJxyhJM@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 19 Jul 24 19:34:45 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-19T19:34:45Z/8955506"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Le 19/07/2024 à 21:04, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > The time to go around the loop is measured to be ≈ 90 μs Yes. > You claim the proton will go around the loop in ≈ 13 ns Absolutely. > Please explain again why a clock on the circuit can't > measure the time between each time the proton passes it, > but only can measure the time between each time the 6933th > proton passes it. Non, je refuse. Je ne suis pas un chien qui doit sans cesse tout ré-expliquer. Il faut au moins que le lecteur fasse l'effort de lire et de comprendre ce qui est dit. Seulement après, il peut être utile en critiquant ce qu'il a compris. > > It is something about time dilation, isn't it ? > And something about that the single clock really is two > clocks fused into one, right? > >> >> Please stop. > > Nope. This is fun! I don't think so. > The result is that I know SR quite well. It's what I said. Paul B.Andersen know SR quite well. But he can't understand that doctor Hachel say, because he speak different. R.H.