Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ydjzfq95q3.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: zpool mirror resilvering: always all or sometimes incremental? Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 22:47:32 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <ydjzfq95q3.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 04:47:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6c08422934549c555e0eab1af04aeb3c"; logging-data="203023"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qb2jVEb6izICJ9fMuzzmU" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VAWaJsdYnWhfv02I141tv0qmmQI= sha1:XikmKWlUxoIA47j5N/z8HHlbHp8= Mail-Copies-To: never Bytes: 1330 Suppose one has a ZFS/zpool mirror. One of the duplicates is detached from the mirror. At a later time, it's re-attached to the same mirror, causing re-silvering. Assume much of the content in the pool hasn't changed between the detach and attach times. Will re-silvering do some sort of incremental update, or always copy everything? Is the answer different for offline/online? Just curious. Thanks, -WBE