Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <zJoYTxE6KhyhZU0L982EhziUQRg@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.
References: <9f779645de1a83b1f2f35ab0a1885329@www.novabbs.com> <OLKtP.3284$lVra.392@fx02.ams4>
 <1826007a482dd75b$2449$1498207$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <bde0ac6f7aa9059e84658916b8af2ab9@www.novabbs.com>
 <saNtP.10507$jgOa.5162@fx17.ams4> <kouLCsgAPww84eUhy98fxyEW4i0@jntp> <m1qrkcFu6qdU5@mid.individual.net>
 <R2F832BcXoyJihIgfMeF6ml2obE@jntp> <m1tcq0Fbu8uU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: bOAqWssEIY804m5aNP-uB5qAaSQ
JNTP-ThreadID: 9f779645de1a83b1f2f35ab0a1885329@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=zJoYTxE6KhyhZU0L982EhziUQRg@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 25 20:52:31 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-02-22T20:52:31Z/9218441"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 3008
Lines: 32

Le 22/02/2025 à 08:31, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>> 
>> That's what the scientists say.
>> I can't help but think that this is all a bit unclear.
>> 
> 
> Well, possibly.

Many things scientists say are not very clear.
It would not be a major problem in the history of humanity if they agreed 
to discuss it, and to come back to the less clear points, to doubt them, 
or even abandon them.
But they do not want to.
Maybe artificial intelligence will one day become truly intelligent and 
truly efficient. Maybe.
It will then impose the logical concepts that today's physicists and 
mathematicians do not want to hear. Maybe.
This will necessarily involve a lot of astonishment.
I remind you that I managed to rewrite ALL of special relativity with ALL 
the correct equations, just as I denounced "problems" in the basic 
concepts of complex numbers taught at school, where things are incorrect 
and extraordinarily complicated (we don't even know how to clearly explain 
what i is, and we believe absurdities such as if i²=-1 then i^4=1 since 
(-a)²(-a)²=a^4).
For 40 years I have been pointing out, here and there, huge blunders of 
logic and concept, asking that we review things that seem clear, but are 
nevertheless false.
Human arrogance invariably answers me that if all this were false, it 
would be known.
It would be known?
Are we sure?

R.H.