Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<zP3ZN4so3W9aNXqAcM8e8QcUwUY@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <zP3ZN4so3W9aNXqAcM8e8QcUwUY@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?= References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v6kacc$1ho2l$1@dont-email.me> <v6kb9f$1hehi$2@dont-email.me> <v6n02q$231iu$3@dont-email.me> <v6n0mu$22nd0$5@dont-email.me> <v6n1q7$22opo$9@dont-email.me> <v6n3gg$22ncv$4@dont-email.me> <24df469f-903d-4b10-a296-36cb26113bb4@att.net> <PaYSquiOWoAArFrq724peg1nKPk@jntp> <0654078d-76b5-4b52-9e45-3c0a90d5fd47@att.net> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: _zMu_g7XlRI6qTX96gSvE8Q8mAU JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=zP3ZN4so3W9aNXqAcM8e8QcUwUY@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Sat, 13 Jul 24 15:43:08 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-07-13T15:43:08Z/8946484"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2214 Lines: 19 Le 12/07/2024 à 22:23, Jim Burns a écrit : > On 7/12/2024 1:04 PM, WM wrote: >> says a person who believes that >> by exchanging two elements >> one of them can be lost. > > I have never claimed ℵ₀ = 2 You have claimed that by exchanging X and O an O can disappear, in fact infinitely many can disappear by pure exchange. > The set ℕ⁺ᴮᵒᵇ of > cardinals which, when augmented, are bigger plus Bob > has the same cardinality ℵ₀ as Cardinality is nonsense as my proof shows. There is no counting but only exchanging. You cannot consistently argue with rules which are disproved. Regards, WM