X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4f48:0:b0:626:1c13:96d7 with SMTP id eu8-20020ad44f48000000b006261c1396d7mr287264qvb.10.1686312827492;
        Fri, 09 Jun 2023 05:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:e705:0:b0:569:e888:be4b with SMTP id
 x5-20020a81e705000000b00569e888be4bmr767683ywl.3.1686312827190; Fri, 09 Jun
 2023 05:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: fr.sci.physique
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 05:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <XsQK06WmG5UE8EA9eBhXPf3xb2A@jntp>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:861:8bb7:5500:cd2f:cd6c:b048:bbc5;
 posting-account=PKzfqAoAAAC4-vQRW_wt6WFB3xnoeWfi
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:861:8bb7:5500:cd2f:cd6c:b048:bbc5
References: <XsQK06WmG5UE8EA9eBhXPf3xb2A@jntp>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <56158e7e-12e0-4978-af3c-def073d0b065n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_De_la_relativit=C3=A9_des_distances?=
From: Richard Verret <rverret97@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 12:13:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bytes: 2071
Lines: 10

Bonjour M. Arlandis! La contraction des longueurs en relativit=C3=A9 donne =
L=E2=80=99 =3D k L avec k < 1; l=E2=80=99inverse du coefficient de Lorentz =
et non pas le coefficient lui-m=C3=AAme; k =3D sqrt(1 - (Vo/c)^2) https://f=
r.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraction_des_longueurs La contraction des longueu=
rs dans la transformation r=C3=A9ciproque qui est =C3=A9galement la transfo=
rmation de Lorentz donne L =3D k L=E2=80=99 m=C3=AAme pour -v, d=E2=80=99o=
=C3=B9 L=3D k^2 L, relation qui n=E2=80=99est possible que si k =3D 1, or k=
 # 1  avec la transformation de Lorentz. Donc exit cette transformation.
Oui, je sais c=E2=80=99est tr=C3=A8s difficile d=E2=80=99admettre =C3=A7a p=
our les tenants de la relativit=C3=A9 qui ne jure que par la transformation=
 de Lorentz et cette stupidit=C3=A9 d=E2=80=99espace-temps.