Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<99428a5c9e6d6602d47a592bdf159dfc@dizum.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: D <J@M> References: <uvgh5a$1d8l$10@gallifrey.nk.ca> <uvu0mb$325p1$1@dont-email.me> <1qscfld.1ctibjm1vx48dyN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <v023oe$4eu1$1@dont-email.me> <1qscxj3.1y6kvpn1his7pgN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <v02mpc$7ji9$1@dont-email.me> <1qsd1o2.1rdqz6p1n4ckr7N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Censorship is good, actually. If you don't like that fact, maybe you should commit some client-side censorship, otherwise known as the killfile. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <99428a5c9e6d6602d47a592bdf159dfc@dizum.com> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:38:12 +0200 (CEST) Newsgroups: news.software.nntp Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!alphared!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128 Bytes: 2032 Lines: 21 On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 10:42:19 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: >Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote: >> On 21.04.2024 um 09:45 Uhr Sn!pe wrote: >> > I find it hard to believe that genuine new users of Usenet might >> > sincerely hold such regressive, trollish views. If "cancel culture" >> > takes root in Usenet one might as well be on Twitter. >> >> In my age group (Gen Z), such views are widespread. > >"I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend > to the death your right to say it." -- ascribed to Voltaire "Monsieur l' abbe, je deteste ce que vous ecrivez, mais je donnerai My sire of the abbey, I detest that which you write, but I would donate ma vie pour que vous puissiez continuer a ecrire." my life for that you have the puissance to continue to write. --from a quotation by Norbert Guterman, editor of 'A Book of French Quotations', alleged to be from an original Voltaire letter dated 6 Feurier 1771 to M. le Riche (possibly apocryphal, non sequitur).