Deutsch   English   Fran├žais   Italiano  

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: not-for-mail
From: Stan Brown <>
Subject: Re: No fault cell phone law
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:32:56 -0700
Organization: Oak Road Systems
Lines: 25
Message-Id: <>
References: <ut4s0v$9ei$> <ut5bef$353ou$> <ut5s9m$3bjd7$> <> <ut793f$3krla$>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: +YzOkPQEFWYt80jw3ALlyQninOU0J2ShImJzuMWWYSrPZsnPyH
Cancel-Lock: sha1:24wMXEiESCaHpC5C3HgfXI/UmBc= sha256:TTU4UYlPqKEFOfdsXHHzg8QH/x6PP0WZgwPVJvBhH7s=
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.11 (GRC)

On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:26:07 -0700, AJL wrote:
> On 3/17/2024 9:03 AM, Stan Brown wrote:
> All comments below apply to my state AZ/US only. YMMV.
> > There is no such thing as "an automobile driver with the right of
> > way." It's basic driver's ed. You NEVER "have" the right of way.
> A driver can have the right of way.

I wonder about your source for Arizona law.

When I checked for California, there were lots of pages claiming 
circumstances where the driver has the right of way, but they are all 
just trying to keep things simple and readable. 

The actual code doesn't give anyone the right of way at an 
As I said, it details circumstances under which you must yield to 
another vehicle. 

Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
Shikata ga nai...