Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<XnsAD608F92C50AFnospamnospaminvalid@144.76.35.252>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Boris <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: news.software.readers
Subject: Re: Xnews - Displaying Entire Thread
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 21:06:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: This space for rent
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <XnsAD608F92C50AFnospamnospaminvalid@144.76.35.252>
References: <XnsAD5D90FF1ADDDBorisinvalidinvalid@144.76.35.252> <XnsAD5FB0572C873nilch1@wheedledeedle.moc>
Injection-Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 21:06:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="749c2a3b9ff3485ac409080e94823e1f";
	logging-data="15322"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18rkpIP4tpdcCuSygZ5araF"
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yqHvnnIeUrSe/Ez27yg0NKjyaAc=
Bytes: 2124

Nil <rednoise9@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote in 
news:XnsAD5FB0572C873nilch1@wheedledeedle.moc:

> On 04 Jul 2021, Boris <Boris@invalid.invalid> wrote in
> news.software.readers: 
> 
>> Running Xnews 5.04.25
>> 
>> Actually, running the 'test' version, which is just the
>> executable.  I originally installed the 5.04.25 full version for
>> years, but had to reinstall, and choose the test version.
>> 
>> But, now, only on some newsgroups, clicking on a post only gives
>> the latest Re: post of the original post.  I have to click Get
>> Parent to expose all of the thread's posts, even though I have
>> Storage:headers and articles enabled.
>> 
>> Any ideas?
> 
> Maybe your news service has renumbered their articles. Try doing a 
> Catchup (F8) and if necessary, re-download the latest X number of 
> headers (Ctrl+Enter). You might have to do this to every newsgroup, but 
> try one small misbehaving one first.

Thanks for the reply.

I did try the above, but no luck.  It doubled the articles and assigned 
each double the same number as the 'original'article.  See here:

https://postimg.cc/rd4tYfFh