X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1997:b0:751:8176:c3f5 with SMTP id bm23-20020a05620a199700b007518176c3f5mr20723qkb.7.1683214840155;
        Thu, 04 May 2023 08:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:9843:0:b0:b9a:696a:770f with SMTP id
 k3-20020a259843000000b00b9a696a770fmr150446ybo.13.1683214839966; Thu, 04 May
 2023 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: fr.sci.physique
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Gkl1ARnf7NAt5uSyXM0C8SFQyYs@jntp>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:861:8bb7:5500:5d93:e17a:229:e557;
 posting-account=PKzfqAoAAAC4-vQRW_wt6WFB3xnoeWfi
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:861:8bb7:5500:5d93:e17a:229:e557
References: <u0r2k6$161g2$1@dont-email.me> <u13que$2kt04$1@dont-email.me>
 <u13t5s$rq$2@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <u13u8n$2l71c$2@dont-email.me>
 <eu6-atxrEppmGwQfAd86ghgZ6-U@jntp> <u1434c$2m51m$2@dont-email.me>
 <T66X88xOsCfsVOT48hqiAurwkDY@jntp> <fe9be762-f1d1-4c40-b169-a6c969839efcn@googlegroups.com>
 <YqbmW7-BFyfzFdxsU3tGoIHAgXM@jntp> <u1f70i$26j1b$1@dont-email.me> <Gkl1ARnf7NAt5uSyXM0C8SFQyYs@jntp>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <afc8fcd7-e827-445f-ba4f-78d4aa59e49an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Quand_l=27I=2EA=2E_p=C3=A8te_les_plombs_sur_la_RR=2E?=
From: Richard Verret <rverret97@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 15:40:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2451
Bytes: 2684
Lines: 13

J=E2=80=99ai longtemps dout=C3=A9 de mon machin mais apr=C3=A8s sa validati=
on par une instance scientifique, je me suis demand=C3=A9 d=E2=80=99o=C3=B9=
 venait la diff=C3=A9rence entre la th=C3=A9orie d=E2=80=99Einstein et la m=
ienne. Je l=E2=80=99ai d=C3=A9j=C3=A0 dit, j=E2=80=99en ai conclu qu=E2=80=
=99Einstein avait r=C3=A9solu un faux probl=C3=A8me et je ne dis pas =C3=A7=
a =C3=A0 la l=C3=A9g=C3=A8re. La relativit=C3=A9 restreinte a plus d=E2=80=
=99un si=C3=A8cle et vu les changements qu=E2=80=99il y a eu pendant ce si=
=C3=A8cle, il est normal que l=E2=80=99approche de cette question soit diff=
=C3=A9rente.=20
Il est absolument inutile de s=E2=80=99=C3=A9gosiller, nous ne serons pas e=
ntendus tant que nous n=E2=80=99aurons pas publi=C3=A9, et encore,  certain=
s r=C3=A9sisteront, il en a =C3=A9t=C3=A9 ainsi de tout temps.
Cordialement,
Richard