X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWZnLMD0eMwlMYwLOoL/JCiupB3fEL2IvJiDj8EDWi8KYUe+mAlnSnKqC7H1z8exYIz37P76wUMkrmQdLaT5OVLOIKeKbOT7vNTO0GwHCVqGyw=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:574e:0:b0:42c:3f43:dd88 with SMTP id 14-20020ac8574e000000b0042c3f43dd88mr101231qtx.8.1707299832033;
        Wed, 07 Feb 2024 01:57:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXrA037C2o0OhIvzAYHHGBwRWZYi9t1ngJzNL9mNU3f2654W2JYDKJ019AHQW7MMyhZRCJdmn2v8RknrHEWizy+5De8iRsaD6HCcqKMngslqvo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2084:b0:dc6:c2e4:5126 with SMTP id
 di4-20020a056902208400b00dc6c2e45126mr1088208ybb.12.1707299831811; Wed, 07
 Feb 2024 01:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: fr.sci.physique
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 01:57:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DW92nFHJWuLhj8tja7lpdnF-2Zc@jntp>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a01:e0a:170:e3f0:b9dc:88a:c6e6:9ce;
 posting-account=PKzfqAoAAAC4-vQRW_wt6WFB3xnoeWfi
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a01:e0a:170:e3f0:b9dc:88a:c6e6:9ce
References: <DW92nFHJWuLhj8tja7lpdnF-2Zc@jntp>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b9e02a80-ed09-4ac4-93f6-74f129daf598n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Le_probl=C3=A8me_de_l=27anisochronie_relativiste=2E?=
From: Richard Verret <rverret97@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 09:57:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bytes: 2051
Lines: 7

Le 07/02/2024 =C3=A0 10:37, Julien Arlandis a =C3=A9crit :
> Sauf oubli de ma part, je n'ai jamais vu en physique une grandeur complex=
e dont la partie r=C3=A9elle n'=C3=A9tait pas de m=C3=AAme dimension que sa=
 partie imaginaire.
Je crois que vous n=E2=80=99avez pas bien lu.
z =3D x + iy =3D =CE=A3(ak + i bk) ek, ak et bk =C3=A9tant des scalaires, x=
 et y ont la m=C3=AAme dimension. Il est vrai que y est relatif =C3=A0 la v=
itesse, mais c=E2=80=99est ce qui fait tout le charme de cet espace.