X-Received: by 2002:a37:54f:0:b0:6ba:5369:5c5a with SMTP id 76-20020a37054f000000b006ba53695c5amr11844054qkf.253.1661164954798;
        Mon, 22 Aug 2022 03:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b025:b0:11d:402f:5f8c with SMTP id
 y37-20020a056870b02500b0011d402f5f8cmr2466695oae.259.1661164954453; Mon, 22
 Aug 2022 03:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: fr.sci.astrophysique
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 03:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <da7cd3e9-29c2-4437-9c45-567c21dc4afen@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Difference between Einsteinian Physics and Einstein-Free Physics
From: Pentcho Valev <pentcho.valev@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:42:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bytes: 2001
Lines: 19

As the observer starts moving towards the light source with speed v https:/=
/youtube.com/watch?v=3Dbg7O4rtlwEE, the frequency at the observer shifts fr=
om f=3Dc/d to f'=3D(c+v)/d, where d is the distance between subsequent ligh=
t pulses. This result is acceptable in both Einsteinian physics and Einstei=
n-free physics, but then there is a difference:

Einsteinian physics: The distance between subsequent pulses shifts from d t=
o d'=3Ddc/(c+v) so that the speed of the pulses relative to the moving obse=
rver can gloriously remain unchanged.

Einstein-free physics: The distance between subsequent pulses remains uncha=
nged. The speed of the pulses relative to the moving observer shifts from c=
 to c'=3Dc+v.

Clearly Einsteinian physics is absurd while Einstein-free physics is reason=
able.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev