Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<fMkwaum8m0SYeI-kemB56tKi3mc@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <fMkwaum8m0SYeI-kemB56tKi3mc@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?L=E2=80=99=C3=A9ruption=20du=20Hunga-Tonga=20et=20le=20sile?= =?UTF-8?Q?nce=20des=20climatologues?= References: <uj3iqc$1ubfv$1@dont-email.me> <uj5m72$2cdmf$1@dont-email.me> <039ede7b-7de8-49f2-92e5-4786da9b9cbfn@googlegroups.com> <dAG5N.154292$96D1.7189@fx04.ams4> <krosqeF716eU1@mid.individual.net> <UTI5N.326964$tzR.151339@fx05.ams4> <ZnEjYvoxD6-mOgvXs7rJUOvhFwo@jntp> <lzJ5N.135592$ydda.22805@fx13.ams4> <nmbhneI1O3VRjKSb3D1eNuTrR1Y@jntp> <r_M5N.45079$84ya.13270@fx10.ams4> Newsgroups: fr.soc.environnement JNTP-HashClient: R9oR0s8pIz1sikeqyxieAo2FrNg JNTP-ThreadID: uj3iqc$1ubfv$1@dont-email.me JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=fMkwaum8m0SYeI-kemB56tKi3mc@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 17 Nov 23 17:06:11 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Iron Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="43d157f9437411bd9c60ee58b39a513a2d9d2b85"; logging-data="2023-11-17T17:06:11Z/8405890"; posting-account="3@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@news2.nemoweb.net" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Eric M <conanospamic@gmail.com> Bytes: 2255 Lines: 13 Le 17/11/2023 à 18:00, Paul Aubrin a écrit : >>>> >>>> <https://www.nationalgeographic.fr/environment/2019/04/le-niveau-de-co2-dans-latmosphere-bat-un-record-vieux-de-3-millions-dannees> >>> Ah Ah ! Eric M. ne comprend pas le sens du mot VARIATION. >> Un record de 3 millions d'années battu, ce n'est pas une variation. > Il n'y a pas eu de record de 3 millions d'années National Geographic cite Science, mais Aubrin va vous bricoler un graphique qui dit le contraire en trois minutes et c'est à lui qu'il faut donner raison, surréaliste :)