Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <sFVsteOhJ9tQehdwjFNWQJawodY@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Is it a =?UTF-8?Q?Joke=3F=20=3F=20=3F?=
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <vak80b$2u8l5$1@dont-email.me> <5U7no7_ss4o5VC4H35bOoOqEi6w@jntp>
 <val4pj$332jq$1@dont-email.me> <PV2oATKbq9mjQDVMXlzvbvCPLMU@jntp> <vala23$33mgn$2@dont-email.me>
 <2hjjdokckxPswv9vzkiMV5N_680@jntp> <vanq5h$3irq8$1@dont-email.me> <KEAdeNaSGPhdUQc32DGS2HcmhqA@jntp>
 <vaplj0$3upoa$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: STGzwuEDI0PkUsHYUDVL39eKYpc
JNTP-ThreadID: v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=sFVsteOhJ9tQehdwjFNWQJawodY@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 24 11:53:26 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-29T11:53:26Z/9004667"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 3497
Lines: 52

Le 29/08/2024 à 13:21, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
 
> I won't bother to comment your claim that the speed of light
> between a watch and yourself depends on "how you position yourself".

That is indeed what I said.

Due to universal anisochrony, the speed of light depends
on the position of the observer.

It is obvious that if it moves from left to right, transversely, or from 
right to left, the speed of light will be the same.

Let's say that I have not measured it yet, that I just know that it is 
very fast, so I cannot say precisely what it is.

But AT LEAST, can I suppose that it would be very surprising if it moved 
faster in one direction or another. Which would be an absurdity in a 
concept of refutation of absolute or privileged referent.

If I can measure this transverse speed from A to B (i.e. without possible 
Doppler effect that could distort my measurement) I will find 
Vo=3.10^8m/s.

And then, it's true, if I practice in the other direction, I will still 
find
Vo=3.10^8m/s.

It is equal in both directions, and it is logical that it should be.

I will now turn my device AB by 90°, and I will place myself this time, 
in a position perpendicular to what I was previously, and again, I will 
calculate the transverse speed of light from A to B.

Bingo!

From A to B, or from B to A, I will note Vo=3.10^8m/s

Tears of joy will then slowly flow down my pink cheek:
I have just proven something invariant.

Except that I am an idiot who has not understood anything at all, and who 
has not noticed the enormous bias that I have just described here.

Test:
Did you understand the huge bias that ruined 120 years of relativistic 
work, and produced stupid concepts, stupid equations and stupid hatreds?

[ ] Yes, I understood the bias.
[ ] No, I didn't understand anything at all, and I know that Hachel is the 
biggest moron on earth.

R.H.