Path: ...!3.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: PaulAubrin <paul.aubrin@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: fr.soc.environnement
Subject: Re: Un mouton invalide le consensus scientifique ?
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:12:19 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <t8hnik$j71$1@dont-email.me>
References: <62ac3a62$0$22073$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:12:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a8e0a35aa5fdc1fdfc6db750bb4048bc";
	logging-data="19681"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18unHsr4k6DENN8ErxeBw3SX1D3x/6ScQ0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PXD8z53MyLHHfvJUvYvLU4UKAtU=
In-Reply-To: <62ac3a62$0$22073$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: fr
Bytes: 1397

Le 17/06/2022 à 10:25, kw a écrit :
> Pour illustrer la cerise qui invaliderait le consensus scientifique :)
> 
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVWvSfCWIAAQeCw?format=jpg&name=small
> 

Consensus scientifique est un oxymore.