Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<u2jdst$30cvf$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1924:: with SMTP id bj36mr930729qkb.526.1644411444255; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e850:: with SMTP id a77mr950739qkg.239.1644411443908; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 04:57:23 -0800 (PST) Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 04:57:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <401c67b3-d22b-4d66-b6f1-5cb5dd4a35b2n@googlegroups.com> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=198.98.183.148; posting-account=1gtAQwoAAACE2HloXQknyoZStt5Ksj9z NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.98.183.148 References: <4edp7v0qe3hqd09pm9e1qapvurj2itaua5@4ax.com> <dfbfc9b9.0303221453.414f6fe2@posting.google.com> <vbcu7vsfcinji0q6ujn53l36hm6ilupjtn@4ax.com> <dfbfc9b9.0303241354.7d78364e@posting.google.com> <8st08vsmduivs23t5cks9951l33n4b1538@4ax.com> <qRBga.1021$1O3.5467@news.uswest.net> <g4j68v0bn1vfu565ke22850s8gapo9lrdq@4ax.com> <cRPga.2132$1O3.68002@news.uswest.net> <02m88v0nu92ohhd5mrq8epjn99vog324oq@4ax.com> <NlKja.320$7O4.66062@news.uswest.net> <j7jd9v41vh5p5ctcj52i7s41717mk2nhmr@4ax.com> <401c67b3-d22b-4d66-b6f1-5cb5dd4a35b2n@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <d33f84fc-0d55-44e7-8d1d-76e67d4770cdn@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Why the Pledge shouldn't be said in our schoolsoranywherepublic From: Kavya Patel <digitalmarketing12102016@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 12:57:24 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bytes: 6714 Lines: 121 On Saturday, September 18, 2021 at 3:08:21 PM UTC+5:30, kavy Patel wrote: > On Friday, April 11, 2003 at 7:41:52 PM UTC+5:30, jal...@cox.net wrote:= =20 > > "Founding Father" <f...@qwest.net> wrote:=20 > > >:|=20 > > >:|<jal...@cox.net> wrote in message=20 > > >:|news:02m88v0nu92ohhd5m...@4ax.com...=20 > > >:|=20 > > >:|This is one of the most moronic arguments I have heard. Must be an N= EA=20 > > >:|officer.=20 > > Disprove it dippy. LOL=20 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> A New Look At Vouchers.=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> (Permission of author to use this has been given)=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> Newsgroups: alt.atheism=20 > > >:|> Subject: A new look at vouchers=20 > > >:|> From: ai...@unity.ncsu.edu (Wayne Aiken)=20 > > >:|> Date: 1 Aug 1995 19:13:36 GMT=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> This occurred to me the other day, while listening to a talk-show = debate=20 > > >:|> on school vouchers.=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> Some people want a "rebate" on the money they give to the state to= educate=20 > > >:|> their children, in order to spend that money in religious schools = of their=20 > > >:|> choice. Fine, although that they get might not be what they expect= ..=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> The problem is, the money that a person pays into the system for s= chools,=20 > > >:|> via property taxes, sales tax, etc. is *NOT* for the education of = their=20 > > >:|> own children, but for public education as a whole**. Many of the a= rguments=20 > > >:|> I've heard that support this is that public education is supposed = to be=20 > > >:|> good for the community as a whole, hence everybody pays. I have no= =20 > > >:|children=20 > > >:|> in the school system, yet I must pay to educate other people's chi= ldren.=20 > > >:|> Other people, with children or not, do the same. The illusion inhe= rent in=20 > > >:|> the system is that the money taken from them is taken for "their"= =20 > > >:|children-=20 > > >:|> it is not.=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> If there is to be any "rebate", then the amount given back is *not= * the=20 > > >:|> total amount contributed, but the percentage portion represented b= y their=20 > > >:|> children versus the entire system. If a person pays $5000 into a s= chool=20 > > >:|> system with 1000 children, then the total amount of *their* money = paying=20 > > >:|> for *their* children is $5 per child. That is all they should expe= ct=20 > > >:|> back for removing their children from the public school system; th= e rest=20 > > >:|> is the "common good" payment. Any more than that, received either= =20 > > >:|> through tax credits or voucher payments, means that they have unfa= irly=20 > > >:|> shifted the "common good" burden to other people.=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> If instead, you look at it from the point of the "total" amount of= money=20 > > >:|> for each child following that child, then you have still have the = problem=20 > > >:|> that the vast majority of that total is from *other people*, who c= annot=20 > > >:|> legally be forced to contribute to sectarian institutions against = their=20 > > >:|> will. Despite claims of "choice", it is *still not a free-market s= ystem*=20 > > >:|> as long as the people paying are not the people directly benefitti= ng, and=20 > > >:|> I find it perverse that many otherwise capitalistic-free-market-pr= eaching=20 > > >:|> conservatives have no problem with such a special welfare system, = as long=20 > > >:|> as its to *their* advantage.=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> Any voucher system, no matter how you cut it, is still almost enti= rely=20 > > >:|> *other people's money", and will remain a separation violation, as= long=20 > > >:|> as the socialistic elements remain in the system.=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|> [**] Whether people should be forced to contribute money for colle= ctivist=20 > > >:|> social institutions or not is a separate issue altogether. As long= as=20 > > >:|> the system exists, for better or worse, everyone has to be treated= =20 > > >:|equally.=20 > > >:|> --------------------------------------=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:|>=20 > > >:| > https://getfastcashus.com=E2=80=93 Best For Rapid Deposits. One of the mo= st popular and trustworthy of all money lending portals, GetFastCashUS.com = offers a money-lending space reputable for its free-of-cost services. Anoth= er popular feature offered by GetFastCashUS.com is that it provides its cus= tomers with personal loans. https://easyqualifymoney.com/=E2=80=93 Best For Rapid Deposits. One of the = most popular and trustworthy of all money lending portals, GetFastCashUS.co= m offers a money-lending space reputable for its free-of-cost services. Ano= ther popular feature offered by GetFastCashUS.com is that it provides its c= ustomers with personal loans.