Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uW4nCGULKAXpdcp_DgGS4LpJpGQ@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 82.66.60.35 Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <uW4nCGULKAXpdcp_DgGS4LpJpGQ@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Censure de Marc S et Olivier M a deux vitesses. References: <62573cf6$0$18374$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <625742f8$0$18014$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <t3885q$uqr$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <6257f0f1$0$25138$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <IBc1Qzu2UiSBkAcC8mphct6RaKw@jntp> <t3911s$bbs$1@dont-email.me> <uqlwG6FSiAv5juBsBgOr95CAsts@jntp> <625823c6$0$18016$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <R6TnOrwKM-NUsavdmcwgl3GJugg@jntp> <t39ado$vvt$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch> Newsgroups: fr.usenet.abus.d JNTP-HashClient: S6qo1KOeq5Zuvcw8i1nvjdE6ZSE JNTP-ThreadID: 62573cf6$0$18374$426a74cc@news.free.fr JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=uW4nCGULKAXpdcp_DgGS4LpJpGQ@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 14 Apr 22 14:22:54 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4350.0 Iron Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="43d157f9437411bd9c60ee58b39a513a2d9d2b85"; logging-data="2022-04-14T14:22:54Z/6805392"; posting-account="3@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@news2.nemoweb.net" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Eric M. <conanospamic@gmail.com> Bytes: 2130 Lines: 7 Le 14/04/2022 à 16:17, Marc SCHAEFER a écrit : > Gardons à l'esprit que le but est, in fine, de permettre à chacun de > choisir quels NoCeM appliquer. Au final, les NoCem ont la même utilité que les killfiles quoi :) Sinon, Zorro floode ce forum avec des copies d'articles pris ailleurs, ce serait bien de penser à l'annuler, LLP n'a pas vu apparemment.