Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<unduc7$11rks$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: cris <cris@removespam.me.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Using Android's Mock Location Setting to Watch TV Programming from Other Areas
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 18:34:48 -0230
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <tcensm$2unv2$1@news.mixmin.net>
References: <tc9unn$15o6l$1@dont-email.me> <tca8qr$7mj5$1@solani.org> <tcab0a$19nig$1@dont-email.me> <tcacal$1a1q4$1@dont-email.me> <020820220638406421%nospam@nospam.invalid> <tcbi45$1jbjk$1@dont-email.me> <tcdtla$28lu6$1@dont-email.me> <030820221003294145%nospam@nospam.invalid> <tcek4k$1hgr$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 21:04:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="d66bc30198caafaaf456be48aac757efe6130285";
	logging-data="3104738"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.93/l for MacOS - Full License
Bytes: 4738
Lines: 89

On 03/08/2022 21:00, Andy Burnelli wrote:

> nospam wrote:
> 
>>>> I can get lots of pirate stuff on Usenet.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this a fraud or theft?
>>> 
>>> Theft.
>> 
>> nope. it's copyright infringement.
> 
> Every single time nospam denies facts like a flat earther does, he shows
> his true colors... <https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html>
> 
> It's tiresome to hear low-IQ no-education idiots like nospam claim that
> merely downloading stuff is "copyright infringement" when Google supplies
> _entire_ books (random pages obfuscated) and that's NOT copyright
> infringement, nor are a billion other "fair use" downloads of copyrighted
> material. <https://ogc.harvard.edu/pages/copyright-and-fair-use>
> 
> The problem with people like nospam is... 
> a. They don't own the IQ to comprehend copyright law contains tenets
> b. All of which must exist for it to be considered copyright infringement
>  <https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fair-use-rule-copyright-material-30100.html>
> 
> In summary, it's no longer shocking that these low-IQ no-education iKooks
> can't comprehend something even as simple as fair use copyright tenets.
> 
>> 
>>>> IMO they likely all are in varying degrees...
>>> 
>>> Not true.
>> 
>> it is true.
> 
> It's no longer shocking why I lump people like nospam with only a score of
> IQ points below normal with those like Alan Baker with scores below normal.
> 
> Every single thing nospam claims is easily shown to be completely false.
> 
> The question is why?
> 
> The answer seems to be that nospam is _desperate_ to claim that everything
> he can't figure out how to do on iOS (but not on the mac!) is illegal.
> 
>>> Using a mock location to watch free programming from another geographic 
>>> areas is neither fraud nor theft. 
>> 
>> falsifying credentials to obtain goods or services is fraud.
> 
> As with Alan Baker and the rest of the iKooks, it is no longer shocking
> that you can tell nospam a hundred times that fraud ALWAYS requires
> MULTIPLE tenets to exist, only one of which is obtaining the goods or
> services, and yet, he just doesn't own the IQ nor education to comprehend.
>  <https://www.robertdmitchell.com/common-law-fraud>
> 
>>> The provider is certainly able to put 
>>> their programming behind a paywall if they don't want out of area 
>>> viewers. 
>> 
>> irrelevant. 
> 
> An _adult_ would comprehend what Steve's argument is.
> Not an iKook.
> 
> The only thing an iKook like nospam cares about is to defend the huge
> crippling flaws in the iOS platform to the point of declaring that every
> functionality that nospam _hates_ doesn't exist on iOS must be illegal.
> 
>>> But since that would reduce the number of viewers, they don't 
>>> want to do that since there's a financial benefit to them by increasing 
>>> the number of viewers. They couldn't care less if someone from another 
>>> area wants to watch.
>> 
>> actually, they do, mainly due to licensing requirements.
>> this is most commonly seen with sports.
> 
> Fraud requires a whole bunch of things to exist for it to be fraud.
> Just watching the sports events in and of itself is not fraud.
> 
> It's no longer surprising that nospam can't comprehend that fact.
> 
> All the iKooks suffer from the same three debilitations... 
> 1. They have a low IQ
> 2. None have any education in legal matters 
> 3. All defend every flaw in Apple products to the death

If you filtered out what you call the ikooks, there'd be nobody left here
but you and maybe two or three other people who aren't Apple nutcases.