Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups: news.software.readers
Subject: Re: Free / opensource text-only reader for linux - suggestions,
 please?
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:16:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <uuq7oh$1muhe$2@dont-email.me>
References: <353106c549c5267814e3e2c71aff0b10@www.novabbs.com>
 <slrnv0u6l4.ql4c.philb@ah61.eternal-september.org>
 <uuos5b$1co5f$1@dont-email.me> <871q7j60ub.fsf@tilde.institute>
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 01:16:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bad612f9278d4822db42e3d039f9825f";
	logging-data="1800750"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19t9a92xsN1cy1nLNxpvYbekdQkcrjVOyq558EmvYwcDA=="
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8q0RwzHUcCwxACfCmwtERb3eqiQ=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
 b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
 `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
 ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Bytes: 2461

yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> wrote at 19:55 this Friday (GMT):
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> writes:
>
>> I can't wait for "emacs" to be released as its own distro.
>
> I already thought some Lisp cycles about using emacs' package manager
> for own binaries too.  "Own" as in "managing my $HOME", but I never
> tried to implement it.  It shouldn't have been too complicated as many
> emacs "packages" already include C code that gets built at install time.
>
> But on bad days I think GNU is all about EEE.  Embrace, extend,
> extinguish.  Look at GCC: The GCCisms are so established now that even C
> no longer is the universal portable assembler.  Far too much stuff can
> no longer be built using other compilers.
>
> Writing my stuff in Org/Babel is not a locked in syndrome of the GCC
> level.  Org documents stay text and if all else fails, a human can read
> and understand that.
>
> I'm commuting between hating GNU and liking Org/Babel multipe times per
> day.


At least they don't seem as bad as Ubuntu?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom