Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vaabma$1j0cc$1@paganini.bofh.team>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 04:24:12 +0000
Subject: Re: MS Access
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10
References: <LhednausWIoLFwf7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <87h6cl74ix.fsf@tilde.institute> <v7gf9l$3i29q$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvajisi.3e0ab.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v8cjq4$1f67q$1@dont-email.me> <lh9ateF6q3tU14@mid.individual.net>
 <v8o7hq$45kh$1@dont-email.me> <lh9tj0F6q3tU28@mid.individual.net>
 <v8ovem$8t63$7@dont-email.me> <lhas1sFire7U2@mid.individual.net>
 <66b15688@news.ausics.net> <v8rqj1$16a8l$2@dont-email.me>
 <lhg3ncF7b2uU16@mid.individual.net> <v8um5n$24r3n$1@dont-email.me>
 <LRSdnT9Ez9OBky77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <v8v56g$28un4$2@dont-email.me>
 <OYGcnR-PPK1ZvCn7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <v91d2p$3m8hk$2@dont-email.me>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: vector apex
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:23:59 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <v91d2p$3m8hk$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <RpacnUwixszxEyT7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 20
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-I9lk1CpW9k4b7KohLzdVgtrs4BoMsuPexiKiu6qNwmgHhi1Q/tyRzehYhUCZ0w/3J8WSCXfgsr0t0uE!XSYjMYhIriOwxl3/dT1au2S2Digqw78iLUrjvPDCr4aoxUcmBf6pv2tIi6O624JwVvmCz4hIpa9x!BkZowfcdNqOLZ5myyP5G
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2384

On 8/7/24 11:12 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 21:39:15 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> 
>> On 8/7/24 2:45 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> Sure, if you think 2GB is enough for a database.
>>
>> Alas I don't think M$ is motivated.
> 
> That’s why it’s time to move on.

   Or be creative ... DBs can be split up into
   <2gb sections.

   Also, for many interests in the "Access" range,
   2gb may be All They Need. Don't throw away
   perfectly good/refined solutions - just use
   them where most appropriate.