Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vapteg$3va7q$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Is it a Joke? ? ?
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:36:22 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <vapteg$3va7q$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <vak80b$2u8l5$1@dont-email.me>
 <5U7no7_ss4o5VC4H35bOoOqEi6w@jntp> <val4pj$332jq$1@dont-email.me>
 <PV2oATKbq9mjQDVMXlzvbvCPLMU@jntp> <vala23$33mgn$2@dont-email.me>
 <2hjjdokckxPswv9vzkiMV5N_680@jntp> <vanq5h$3irq8$1@dont-email.me>
 <KEAdeNaSGPhdUQc32DGS2HcmhqA@jntp> <vaplj0$3upoa$1@dont-email.me>
 <sFVsteOhJ9tQehdwjFNWQJawodY@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:35:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8d26fcdedb52beba8fe121381af51556";
	logging-data="4172026"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+f/CpHtailQ4Jq0UvH7oKp"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UerWkSc3SdoPHb7VU8ZTmbAPZR4=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <sFVsteOhJ9tQehdwjFNWQJawodY@jntp>
Bytes: 3092

Den 29.08.2024 13:53, skrev Richard Hachel:
> 
> It is obvious that if it moves from left to right, transversely, or from 
> right to left, the speed of light will be the same.
> 
> Let's say that I have not measured it yet, that I just know that it is 
> very fast, so I cannot say precisely what it is.
> 
> But AT LEAST, can I suppose that it would be very surprising if it moved 
> faster in one direction or another. Which would be an absurdity in a 
> concept of refutation of absolute or privileged referent.
> 
> If I can measure this transverse speed from A to B (i.e. without 
> possible Doppler effect that could distort my measurement) I will find 
> Vo=3.10^8m/s.
> 
> And then, it's true, if I practice in the other direction, I will still 
> find
> Vo=3.10^8m/s.
> 
> It is equal in both directions, and it is logical that it should be.
> 
> I will now turn my device AB by 90°, and I will place myself this time, 
> in a position perpendicular to what I was previously, and again, I will 
> calculate the transverse speed of light from A to B.
> 
> Bingo!
> 
>  From A to B, or from B to A, I will note Vo=3.10^8m/s
> 
> Tears of joy will then slowly flow down my pink cheek:
> I have just proven something invariant.
> 
> Except that I am an idiot who has not understood anything at all, and 
> who has not noticed the enormous bias that I have just described here.
> 
What are you babbling about?

It is thoroughly experimentally verified that the speed of light
is isotropic, constant and invariant.
The number c = 299792458 m/s follows from the definition of the units.

Only an ignorant moron would claim:
"the speed of light depends on the position of the observer."


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/