Path: ...!localhost!dritz+hfrarg From: David Ritz Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Subject: Old porn spammer(s) on the block (was Re: New porn Spammer on the block?) Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:55:17 -0600 Organization: SpamBusters! Message-ID: cc: Jerry Reynolds In-Reply-To: References: X-To: Brad Allison X-Cc: Jerry Reynolds X-Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email, news.admin.net-abuse.usenet X-Comment-1: Spam is bad. X-Comment-2: LART a spammer for Dobbs. X-Comment-3: Invalid assumptions tend to produce invalid conclusions. X-Pgp-0xEA5553D1: F366 BD03 F3EB 75D3 F117 7B46 1183 5A08 X-Pgp-0x1A12DEEB: 9CD0 5537 5C05 4660 38D2 1948 52BC 2999 1A12 DEEB X-Pgp-0x3D13E451: B295 04D6 BC4E 9D19 FD82 EDC2 1499 1F5D 3D13 E451 X-Meow: yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 185 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- [followup set to news.admin.net-abuse.usenet] On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, in article (), Brad Allison (not Chad Redman ) wrote: Brad, You and Jerry "SpamZilla" Reynolds appear to be up to some of your old tricks. I thought, you'd gone legit. I guess I need to reread my own headers regarding assumptions. BA> X-Proxy-User: $$-nw$ It's nice of you to add these headers to posts through news.netzilla.net^Wnews.sexzilla.com^Wnews.newsfeeds.com. It made it ever so easy to identify who really posted this forgery. Please see and . : #! rnews 694 : X-Proxy-User: $$-nw$ : From: Chad Redman : Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email : Subject: New porn Spammer on the block? : User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X) : Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:12:56 -0600 : Message-ID: : Lines: 10 : X-Comments: This message was posted through : Newsgroups: microsoft.public.inetserver.iis : References: <42175929_1@127.0.0.1> <#RY1g7qFFHA.936@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl> : Subject: Re: Strange Problem : Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:29:55 -0600 : Lines: 30 : X-Priority: 3 : X-MSMail-Priority: Normal : X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 : X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 : X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original : Message-ID: <421a5280_5@127.0.0.1> : X-Comments: This message was posted through From: Chad Redman Interesting, that an address last appearing on Usenet in January 1998, should reappear at this time. See . BA> Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email BA> Subject: New porn Spammer on the block? You, of all people, should be able to spot a porn spammer. How, pray tell, did you miss by so wide a mark? BA> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X) It's "nice: to see you're still using MT-NewsWatcher, just as you and Jerry did when you were spamming tens of thousands of articles, as part of the "Netzilla Spam, Fraud and Forgery Factory". BA> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:12:56 -0600 BA> Message-ID: BA> Lines: 10 BA> X-Comments: This message was posted through X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeeds.com does not condone, BA> X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to BA> Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups. BA> Path: ...!news.glorb.com!news-out.newsfeeds.com!spool9-west!not-for-mail BA> THIS IS AN EXAMPLE TO SHOW HOW PEOPLE CAN LIE ON USENET AND THAT BA> WHAT IS POSTED TO USENET DOES NOT MAKE IT TRUE. Well, that's certainly the case when it comes to spammers like you. It does not, however, mean the the inverse it necessarily true, despite attempts at altering historical fact. BA> The following is not true and is an example only. BA> I heard that Dave Forster from Fargo is a pedophile The following apparently IS true and is also used as an example: Porn spam allegation brings suit At about the same time this article appeared, a whole series of forged cancels also came through news.netzilla.net^Wnews.sexzilla.com^Wnews.newsfeeds.com. These were originated from another account, "X-Proxy-User: $$fdw_7f". Please see or . "Chad Redman " is a particularly interesting choice to forge, especially since I'd seen the same From line _very_ recently, in control.cancel. : X-Proxy-User: $$fdw_7f : From: Chad Redman : Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet : Subject: cmsg cancel : User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.3b1 (PPC Mac OS X) : Control: cancel : Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:57:31 -0600 : Message-ID: : Lines: 6 : X-Comments: This message was posted through : : : ----== Posted via Newsgroups.com - Usenet Access to over 100,000 Newsgroups ==---- : Get Anonymous, Uncensored, Access to West and East Coast Server Farms at! : ----== Highest Retention and Completion Rates! HTTP://WWW.NEWSGROUPS.COM ==---- Forgive me. Here I must make an assumption: Based on the fact that all of the articles being cancelled refer to Jerry Reynolds, I have to believe that Jerry's trying to revise history. Let's just see what Chris Redman had to say, back on 21 December _1996_. ( or ). Well, I can certainly see why Jerry "SpamZilla" Relnolds would be trying to bury that article, if he is, in fact the John Doe referenced in Dave Forster's article. For a complete reference to the old articles against which these cancels were issued, please see . This document includes the Message-ID of an article against which a cancel was issued, a reference to whether it was effective in hiding that article on groups-beta.google.com and a URL for the original article against which the cancel was issued. Thanks for finding the archived articles Jerry appears to feel damage his case against Ed Falk the most. While not everything posted to Usenet is true, enough of it is, to keep things interesting. How can you guys still be so lame, after all these years. - -- David Ritz ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========