Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 05:27:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <slrn101baac.7uk4.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
References: <oG5OP.1820195$BrX.647879@fx12.iad>
 <1irOP.851750$d51.585824@fx46.iad>
 <slrn100mumt.dkd.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vuh558$11toh$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrn100obf3.pd6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <slrn100oj38.81kf.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <V74PP.2709395$OrR5.911761@fx18.iad>
 <slrn100rkkh.bh86.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <HTuPP.2635138$eNx6.1862988@fx14.iad>
 <slrn100ucb4.cuiu.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <slrn100uq8q.ju6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <SPKPP.534546$541.133137@fx47.iad> <m79u7iF2bf9U1@mid.individual.net>
 <slrn100vnke.a2i.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <xPRPP.2578086$2zn8.395648@fx15.iad>
 <slrn1010rkg.19bh.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <Cp4QP.2986768$t84d.1101795@fx11.iad>
 <slrn1011o35.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
 <xa6QP.2986769$t84d.1312598@fx11.iad>
 <slrn1012g43.20o7.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <VAbQP.2724172$eNx6.2590362@fx14.iad>
 <slrn1012jpu.251e.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <LodQP.353393$cYP6.116521@fx08.iad>
 <slrn101aj0n.2sik.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>
 <nOcRP.27245$0jW7.22367@fx09.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 07:27:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="36be7ea2f899174ee746daee14abd568";
	logging-data="2999110"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+d5bfLDiqi5gZi7Fv2F7xO"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AqPGICh9Vg/gkCT+pBWhXkOE83w=
Bytes: 4054

On 2025-05-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-05-02 18:49, RonB wrote:
<snips>
>> 
>> But this is not Gnome officially speaking. It's someone associated with
>> Gnome whining because Gnome got rid of someone that he apparently respected.
>> They guy who is attacking the Gnome Foundation is the one who wrote "Fuck
>> Nazis, GNOME is Antifa."
>> 
>> And this blog is, apparently, so "influential" that there has been a total
>> of seven responses to this post. And the responses from other Gnome people
>> have not all been supportive.
>> 
>>     Was it really necessary to call right wing people nazis? does this kind
>>     of talk benefit anyone?
>>     
>>     And...
>>     
>>     You lost me when you said “Fuck Nazis. GNOME is Antifa”. Tell me in what
>>     way Antifa is any different to the Nazi Brownshirts in 1930’s Germany? I
>>     think it would be more accurate to say:
>> 
>>     “Fuck Nazis. Antifa is Nazi”.
>> 
>> I don't what the issue is here, or who Sonny is or why he was (apparently)
>> banned from Gnome, but this blogger (who, notice, is opposing Gnome here) is
>> the one who called Gnome Antifa. So, again, Lunduke is click baiting and
>> taking a quote out of context. This guy proves again that truth is not that
>> important to him.
>
> Like I said, it's not the first time that GNOME has been associated with 
> leftist politics. This is just the latest edition. At this point, I'm 
> glad to stay away from them. Besides, I actually prefer KDE.
>
> As of yet, I haven't yet of KDE having any kind of brain-dead Marxists 
> pushing their garbage on the project.

I don't doubt that Gnome can be linked to leftist politics, but that's a far 
cry from insinuating "Gnome is Antifa" as if the Gnome Foundation is 
officially endorsing these violent Antifa morons.

This appears to be just more Lunduke lying by omission in order to create 
click bait. I don't like dishonest bullshit like this. 

-- 
Jesus sat with sinners: He didn't sin
with them. Know the difference.