| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v9qeed$1tedb$12@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:09:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v9qeed$1tedb$12@dont-email.me>
References: <v9q52r$1tedb$1@dont-email.me>
<867e1149d7291cfd965b6974aa22f104635f38aa@i2pn2.org>
<v9qdre$1tedb$11@dont-email.me>
<d0755e4d97f2c3caebf57ebc856ed8078be3c7dd@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:09:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c4a0c817977c3965e873c4f304e2b88";
logging-data="2013611"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6FZygsh3Zmq2BlgJQxqwJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:77EwRiijvhjnZQenxBhXoLaszw4=
In-Reply-To: <d0755e4d97f2c3caebf57ebc856ed8078be3c7dd@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2653
On 8/17/2024 10:06 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/17/24 10:58 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/17/2024 9:10 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/17/24 8:29 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>> HHH(DDD);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3 ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> *It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
>>>> *the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
>>>> *running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, anyone saying that the above is something that CAN be correctly
>>> emulated by the semantics of the x86 language is just a LIAR.
>>>
>>
>> You are inserting a word that I did not say.
>>
>
> To say that DDD is emulated by HHH means that it must be possible to
> validly do that act.
>
You are not going to get very far with any claim that
emulating a sequence of x86 machine-code bytes is impossible.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer