Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2024-12-02 (Monday)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 20:52:02 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <vion5i$lkb9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <UBI20241202@dont-email.me> <vinef6$6jju$1@dont-email.me>
 <vinjo7$8bra$2@dont-email.me> <vink3l$8mue$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:52:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6ae5ae22a379cb0579ca8016756c659d";
	logging-data="708969"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uE5B/3lKBajsJsRkpuRlBwT5cXXV2Qto="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3W3nG72Jok10bl3UJAAWruzocZA=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241203-6, 12/3/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vink3l$8mue$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 2791

On 12/3/2024 10:53 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2024 at 10:47:35 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> 
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> AfrAId on the Peacocks.
>>
>>> It's about a family whose smart house goes all Skynet on them. This has
>>> been done before and mostly done better. You get the feeling throughout
>>> the movie that there were a lot of scenes cut out because a lot of what
>>> the characters do and say seem like a huge overreaction. The husband in
>>> particular seems hugely freaked out by the AI assistant in his home for
>>> no really good reason. I mean, we the audience know it's evil but he's
>>> not supposed to, at least not at that point in the movie, so it makes
>>> you think there must have been scenes that were cut out that explain
>>> why he's not Viking with the AI.
>>
>> C'mon. Tell us what we need to know.
>>
>> Is there a nubile teenage girl having sex shortly before she gets
>> murdered by the AI, hopefully with not safe for Ian nudity?
> 
> Closest it comes is the high school-age daughter whose boyfriend convinces her
> to send him a nude selfie and then uses it to make a deepfake of her doing
> porn and sends it around the school. The AI gets revenge on him on the girl's
> behalf.
> 

Oh this is that movie.  Why didn't you mention John Cho.  I remember 
that scene from the trailer.  At first I was thinking this was a direct 
to TV Lifetime type of flick.  I'll add it to the watch list.  I'm 
already planning to watch a bunch of "AI" type of movies next year, but 
I may get this before then.