Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory Subject: Re: Is Richard a Liar? Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:20:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:20:42 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1191148"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2437 Lines: 16 Am Wed, 15 May 2024 10:10:24 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 5/15/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-05-14 19:34:52 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> *Anyone that says that I am wrong without knowing C is dishonest* >> First you should prove that you know C. > Not at all. Not in the least. Deductive proofs cannot rely on an > argument from authority. Contradiction in three lines. > Anyone that knows C and claims that I am wrong either provides the > required single valid counter-example proving that I am wrong or meets > the [definition] of defamation cases. Or doesn’t care. -- joes