Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:01:00 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <2024May29.090435@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <20240603132227.00004e0f@yahoo.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 20:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="833d2676c15c6cba20cb284ef6441de5"; logging-data="8608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19obG0POevpMritkl+UByPjjNdIE4IeOX8=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9qfN/xsfOA/Vd8hvUashsZqd0FE= Bytes: 1953 Scott Lurndal schrieb: > Adding encryption (which of the dozen standard symmetric and asymmetric > cipher algoritnms?) At the moment, AES. > to a hardware device does increase complexity, and > thus cost at the expense of extensibility (new algorithms come along > periodically). The cost of verifying crypto is a bit higher as it is > very important to get correct when baking into gates. Seems to be fairly common these days, looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set . It appears that one round of AES fits fairly well into one cycle.