Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:18:18 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: SpaceTime Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <6249F967.3B4A@ix.netcom.com> <624B373A.68E5@ix.netcom.com> <624BBDF1.1594@ix.netcom.com> <624C7C50.638A@ix.netcom.com> <17d4f2968eb77c5d$1$422432$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17d4fbd13cb93f7c$1$424441$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 53 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-2.netnews.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 06:18:19 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2770 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d51b870a677a09$2$422432$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3109 W dniu 01.06.2024 o 22:46, Ross Finlayson pisze: > On 06/01/2024 01:37 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> W dniu 01.06.2024 o 21:53, Ross Finlayson pisze: >>> On 06/01/2024 10:48 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>> W dniu 31.05.2024 o 06:25, Tom Roberts pisze: >>>>> On 5/30/24 12:48 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>>>> Spacetime is simply what exists, [...] >>>>> >>>>> No, NOT AT ALL! You REALLY do not understand very basic physics, at a >>>>> fundamental level that distorts all your 'thinking' and everything you >>>>> write. >>>>> >>>>> Spacetime is a MODEL of spatial-temporal relationships observed in the >>>>> real world. >>>> >>>> No, NOT AT ALL! You REALLY do not understand very basic physics, at a >>>> fundamental level that distorts all your 'thinking' and everything you >>>> write. >>>> Spacetime is a MODEL  of spatial-temporal relationships >>>> gedanken/fabricated by some religious maniacs, like yourself. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Space-Time is a perfectly good idea of a >> >> >> Measured its goodness? Or just sure it >> must be perfectly good because you're >> sooooooo best? >> >> >> >> continuous manifold of >>> Euclidean space >> >> >> A lie, of course, your idiot guru has rejected >> Euclidean math as it didn't want to fit his >> madness. >> > > Einstein didn't, he entertained different coordinate settings > and that tensors connect them, then though he at some point > in his expressed opinion said silly things about simultaneity, > later his expressed opinion included a clock hypothesis and > a "the time", where he introduces the "spacial" for the "special" > contra the "spatial" with respect to "t". The mumble of the idiot was not even consistent. And, yes, later on, in his GR shit, his madness reached the point when he rejected basic [Euclidean] math - because it didn't want to fit his postulates.