Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:04:39 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 98 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 06:04:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4cb2a3366a4bdb85a28904f6e3988fec"; logging-data="1435031"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+CzMvc5S6/XtmwaZ8JJjT" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ta/1zGffURaJfVtRim8QvUsmRBs= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 5631 On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a partial >>>>>>>>>>> simulation of a machine indicates what it will do after the >>>>>>>>>>> simulation stopped, and that the simulation of a DIFFERENT >>>>>>>>>>> machine tells you of the behavior of a different machine then >>>>>>>>>>> simulated. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more* >>>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH >>>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad question. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just don't care >>>>>>> about that worthless claim. Only when you cross the line from >>>>>>> talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH saw, to the OBJECTIVE >>>>>>> behavior of the machine the input represents to a Halt Decider, >>>>>>> will you get me caring, and slapping you down hard with a factual >>>>>>> rebuttal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more* >>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH >>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort to >>>>>>> confirm that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a damn >>>>>>> because it is MEANINGLESS. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>> >>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I >>>>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. >>>>> >>>> >>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>> >>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I >>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. >>> >> >> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >> THAT I AM INCORRECT > > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am > not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT *I will dumb it down for you some more* Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe] _DD() [00001db2] 55 push ebp [00001db3] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00001db5] 51 push ecx [00001db6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] [00001db9] 50 push eax ; push DD [00001dba] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] [00001dbd] 51 push ecx ; push DD [00001dbe] e8bff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH *Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention* *He is not a liar* *This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH* https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer