Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 19:07:23 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <216ebf535d0d2a02a652841aa8ddba8e@www.novabbs.com> <433858411d3c6aa17c39265c8a20a3f5@www.novabbs.com> <17d53a7fac30e814$1$428023$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17d53c426a47b060$2$428023$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17d53ec49a35701a$3$428023$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 19:07:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a44ba709ca12fb1a6ecaebd9e39fe9bc"; logging-data="3562505"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19F3+QvwOSW18dKV7VE7mJ8" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:pHHrK/nVR8k2A9f0aRcS7hCotQc= In-Reply-To: <17d53ec49a35701a$3$428023$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3271 Le 02/06/2024 à 19:04, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 02.06.2024 o 18:22, Python pisze: >> Le 02/06/2024 à 18:18, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 02.06.2024 o 17:52, Python pisze: >>>> Le 02/06/2024 à 17:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>> W dniu 02.06.2024 o 17:04, Python pisze: >>>>>> Le 02/06/2024 à 16:56, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>>>>>> Le 02/06/2024 à 15:43, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : >>>>>>>> Wrongo.  There must be FIVE watches, one at O and one each at A, >>>>>>>> B, C >>>>>>>> and D. >>>>>>>> You correctly specified that they must be synchronized.  You >>>>>>>> used slow >>>>>>>> clock >>>>>>>> transport which is approximately correct.  Better to use Einstein >>>>>>>> synchronization. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are five watches, one in O, the other in A, the other in B, >>>>>>> in C, and in D. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are going to carry out an Einstein synchronization, which I >>>>>>> explained (because Einstein does not do it) WHAT this >>>>>>> corresponded to. >>>>>> >>>>>> He did. You've just shown that you are too stupid and stubborn to >>>>>> understand what he meant. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again, >>>>> and trying again to pretend he knows something. >>>>> Tell me, poor stinker, have you already  learnt >>>>> what a function is? Are you still trying to >>>>> determine its properties applying a French >>>>> definition of a different word? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Still struggling with functions and domains, Woz? >>> >>> No, Pyt, I don't. >> >> You definitely are. Sorry. > > No, Pyt, I don't You are. Sorry about that...