Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 17:52:59 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v3i4gs$3cn09$9@dont-email.me>
References: <jU8lD51x3TEU8EM3MBCn_dr5mwo@jntp>
 <bfbd9c23228a1757c6d6e84778338e8e@www.novabbs.com>
 <lc13m1F7qgsU1@mid.individual.net> <rsrS0rFmndU99mqNBYCDLe8cFU0@jntp>
 <216ebf535d0d2a02a652841aa8ddba8e@www.novabbs.com>
 <uS_y7EWpgPGPmPD64dwz49GUbzs@jntp>
 <433858411d3c6aa17c39265c8a20a3f5@www.novabbs.com>
 <YWwYxgio5Eh5Jr-4i-eHyfSdl2o@jntp> <v3i1ma$3cn09$4@dont-email.me>
 <17d53a7fac30e814$1$428023$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 17:53:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a44ba709ca12fb1a6ecaebd9e39fe9bc";
	logging-data="3562505"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lCHyqIpCH7FiT7s26vncZ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pIa1ttmxomK5ko9BaT106meFkQo=
In-Reply-To: <17d53a7fac30e814$1$428023$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2607

Le 02/06/2024 à 17:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 02.06.2024 o 17:04, Python pisze:
>> Le 02/06/2024 à 16:56, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>> Le 02/06/2024 à 15:43, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>>>> Wrongo.  There must be FIVE watches, one at O and one each at A, B, C
>>>> and D.
>>>> You correctly specified that they must be synchronized.  You used slow
>>>> clock
>>>> transport which is approximately correct.  Better to use Einstein
>>>> synchronization.
>>>
>>> There are five watches, one in O, the other in A, the other in B, in 
>>> C, and in D.
>>>
>>> We are going to carry out an Einstein synchronization, which I 
>>> explained (because Einstein does not do it) WHAT this corresponded to.
>>
>> He did. You've just shown that you are too stupid and stubborn to
>> understand what he meant.
> 
> 
> Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
> and trying again to pretend he knows something.
> Tell me, poor stinker, have you already  learnt
> what a function is? Are you still trying to
> determine its properties applying a French
> definition of a different word?
> 

Still struggling with functions and domains, Woz? Sad...