Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 22:22:14 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: <8c92495d4433776d8ddc4706fb1de05b245f5829.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 22:22:14 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3505882"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1916 Lines: 11 Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:11:00 -0500 schrieb olcott: > That it is literally impossible to prove that the following is false > conclusively proves that it is true and the proof really need not be > wrapped in any tuxedo. If you consider it unfalsifiable, why do you care? > We can get on to other key points only after we have closure on this > {foundation of simulating halt deciders} point. What do you need closure for? You only want agreement. -- joes