Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Malcolm McLean Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 23:22:42 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <20240613002933.000075c5@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:22:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3f1d35f1df29894379c714fe809cf0a2"; logging-data="1969537"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oAiDqGSFZLEBmzNemrRK+P5jz1w9YTyQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ihv8grVcm2yBbjXGdtUoyL1/3Ew= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <20240613002933.000075c5@yahoo.com> Bytes: 2275 On 12/06/2024 22:29, Michael S wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:46:44 +0200 > David Brown wrote: > >> >> I also don't imagine that string literals would be much faster for >> compilation, at least for file sizes that I think make sense. > > Just shows how little do you know about internals of typical compiler. > Which, by itself, is o.k. What is not o.k. is that with your level of > knowledge you have a nerve to argue vs bart that obviously knows a lot > more. > >> And I >> have heard (it could be wrong) that MSVC has severe limits on the >> size of string literals, though it is not a compiler I ever use >> myself. >> > > Citation, please.. > When I was writing Crossword Designer I had a massive array containing a lot of rare words which Visual Studio choked on, but it was possible to set a flag. However the strings themselves wereall veru short./ -- Check out my hobby project. http://malcolmmclean.github.io/babyxrc