Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:32:41 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:32:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66"; logging-data="1285587"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/topuaCUOtmtqm26QQQC5q" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:G2vm67tHHY0afYedrfcYh2u9OEY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3177 On 6/24/2024 7:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/24/24 8:34 PM, olcott wrote: >> >> I do correctly refute the halting problem proofs and >> mandate mutual agreement on each step before I will >> proceed to the next step. > > Nope, you never have because you never use the definition of HALTING, > but insist you get to LIE about what halting is. > > You are just talking about your POOP. > > You are just to stupid to understand what you are talking about. > >> >> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped* >> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped* >> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped* >> >> > > Where? *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie* D correctly simulated by H does not have the same behavior as the directly executed D(D) because the call from D to H(D,D) cannot possibly return when D is correctly simulated by H. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer