Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 05:12:29 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <20240603221052.522@kylheku.com> References: <20240602110213.00003b25@yahoo.com> <20240602162914.0000648c@yahoo.com> <20240603120043.00003511@yahoo.com> <20240603225856.0000679d@yahoo.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 07:12:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3aa8a3c73810addcc9c23577ef41fea1"; logging-data="326551"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W9nRTyHReILyYgnEnOH388k9bgO3TEHY=" User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zd+GIj5SKUH/nLzPK+MvvKg5+Vo= Bytes: 2501 On 2024-06-03, Michael S wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:50:50 GMT > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: > >> David Brown writes: >> > >> >1. Most well-known RTOS kernels have a history stretching back to >> >the previous century. C++ was not nearly as viable an option at >> >that time, for a great many reasons. >> >> I would disagree with this. The Chorus microkernel (Chorus Systemes, >> later purchased by Sun) was started in the late 1980's and was >> written in C++ (with a small set of assembler functions). This was >> using Cfront (2.1 and later 3.0). I'm pretty sure it is still in >> use. This was long before templates, exceptions or the standard >> library. >> > > If Chorus is your idea of well-known then I wonder what you call > obscure. I also know about Chorus. However, not from actual work exposure to it. I remember it from operating systems courses at school; i.e. academia. -- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca