Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bonita Montero Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:40:35 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <86fru6gsqr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <8634q5hjsp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86le3wfsmd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240605005916.00001b33@yahoo.com> <86le3dlh24.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240610151453.000027ef@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:40:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f3b6891723712addaa1d65752183a499"; logging-data="496096"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+t3JLt9gZ8V4qnym2ANN7HzzqgBc67/hg=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:eRNDgo2T/drw6qbOb49DWXN7XxM= In-Reply-To: <20240610151453.000027ef@yahoo.com> Content-Language: de-DE Bytes: 2000 Am 10.06.2024 um 14:14 schrieb Michael S: > On the other hand, it is probably billions of billions times weaker > than what now considered "good enough" for crypto hash. You can't compare it to a crypto hash if the result is 64 bit.