Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 00:57:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <v3tlue$1o860$9@dont-email.me>
References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <v2unfe$3alds$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2v637$3cunk$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
	<v3dmq6$2edto$1@dont-email.me> <hOu6O.6223$xPJ1.1866@fx09.iad>
	<20240602110213.00003b25@yahoo.com> <v3hn2j$3bdjn$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240602162914.0000648c@yahoo.com> <v3ii22$3g9ch$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240603120043.00003511@yahoo.com> <v3kra8$3vgef$1@dont-email.me>
	<Kvm7O.5231$Ktt5.2929@fx40.iad> <20240603225856.0000679d@yahoo.com>
	<3uq7O.9130$nd%8.1870@fx45.iad> <20240603221239.245@kylheku.com>
	<v3nk1q$h9jb$1@dont-email.me> <v3p38t$s5n4$2@dont-email.me>
	<v3p9hj$tda7$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 02:57:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="21a6995757d724b8d83dd14f044d030a";
	logging-data="1843392"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cIYVq9731j+6rbrrcmofC"
User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3G90d0abWTGAeBgimz28FUVGPV0=
Bytes: 1788

On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 04:01:28 -0500, BGB wrote:

> For my bounds-checking in C, there are no syntactic changes to C.

But how efficient is it? Those research papers I mentioned reported being 
able to get the execution overhead in Pascal down to something like 5-10%.