Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0
 ---Boilerplate Reply
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:22:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v5fce0$1nsua$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v50o2t$2fh98$2@dont-email.me>
 <v51dc8$2jmrd$1@dont-email.me> <v53b0s$324b4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v53tjm$35vak$1@dont-email.me> <v5415i$lkkc$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v543k2$376u3$1@dont-email.me> <v5460r$lkkc$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v54br6$38n2k$2@dont-email.me> <v54c3r$lkkc$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v54crs$38n2k$4@dont-email.me> <v5f9fh$134dk$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66";
	logging-data="1831882"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LZl7oLgZb2voMWKX/ULFZ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:n0Rqk6V9+giHztCADAXfdWQ2E0A=
In-Reply-To: <v5f9fh$134dk$3@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3151

On 6/25/2024 3:31 PM, joes wrote:
> Am Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:22:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 6/21/2024 12:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/21/24 1:04 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/21/2024 10:25 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/21/24 10:44 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/21/2024 9:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/21/24 9:01 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2024 2:44 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Op 20.jun.2024 om 16:12 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/20/2024 3:09 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Op 20.jun.2024 om 02:00 schreef olcott:
> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If the simulation of a program with a loop of 5 iterations is
>>>>>>>>>>> aborted after 3 iterations, all instructions are correctly
>>>>>>>>>>> simulated. Nevertheless, it is an incorrect simulation, because
>>>>>>>>>>> it should simulate up to the final state of the program.
> 
>>>>> First, NO ONE has said that *H* (or what every you are calling your
>>>>> decider today) can correct simulate the input to a final state.
> 
>> When there is no mapping from the finite string x86 machine language
>> input to H(D,D) to the behavior of D(D) then H(D,D) IS NOT being asked
>> about the behavior of D(D).

> It means that H can't do the mapping, i.e. it is not simulating correctly.
> It does a different map that doesn't fit its specification.
> 

No that is incorrect. D correctly simulated by every H that can
possibly exist does not have the same behavior of any directly
executed D(D) that halts.

If I ask you: What time is it?
How do you know that my actual question is
what are you planning on having for dinner?


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer