Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0
 ---Boilerplate Reply
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:22:48 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <v54gdo$394bf$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v50o2t$2fh98$2@dont-email.me>
 <v51dc8$2jmrd$1@dont-email.me> <v53b0s$324b4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v53tjm$35vak$1@dont-email.me> <v5415i$lkkc$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v543k2$376u3$1@dont-email.me> <v5460r$lkkc$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v54br6$38n2k$2@dont-email.me> <v54c3r$lkkc$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v54crs$38n2k$4@dont-email.me> <v54dur$lkkc$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v54er3$394bf$2@dont-email.me> <v54f42$lkkc$8@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d3e479354f6c59f79625e93d556f5bfb";
	logging-data="3445103"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/DxopckKzE4rRIxHenCy9P"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rFtGExMKhanhhZUWl6yPH0A1zuI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v54f42$lkkc$8@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3024

On 6/21/2024 1:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/21/24 1:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/21/2024 12:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/21/24 1:22 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When there is no mapping from the finite string x86 machine
>>>> language input to H(D,D) to the  behavior of D(D) then
>>>> H(D,D) IS NOT being asked about the behavior of D(D).
>>>
>>> But there *IS* a mapping, it just isn't a COMPUTABLE MAPPING.
>>>
>>
>> If there is a mapping yet not a computable mapping then
>> the actual halt decider cannot even see the question that
>> the textbooks expect it to see.
> 
> But a decider doesn't "See" the question. it just computes the result it 
> was programmed to give.
> 

It must be the behavior that the input finite string actually specifies.
It cannot be the behavior that the programmer imagines that it specifies.

> You don't seem to understand what a program is. Maybe you are just a 
> badly trained AI that was never trained on computer theory.
> 
>>
>> This is not the same thing as the inability to correctly
>> answer this question. This is something brand new that has
>> never been thought of before.
>>
> 
> Right, you are just proving you have no idea about what programming is 
> about.
> 
> sorry, you are just to stupid to understand.
> 
> Maybe it has never been though of before as it is so based on false 
> ideas that no one has ever been that lost in their logic.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer