Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:15:37 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v50dtp$2e5ij$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v4dn5u$3qbnd$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v4dop4$22o4a$2@dont-email.me> <v4dq07$3qbnc$12@i2pn2.org>
 <v4dqq0$2353n$1@dont-email.me> <v4el9m$3rsd6$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v4f3ec$2akmh$2@dont-email.me> <v4g65a$3tn6q$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4g6vr$2ic0g$1@dont-email.me> <v4gc0b$3tn6r$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gcjc$2msea$1@dont-email.me> <v4geab$3tn6r$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gg0s$2nim8$2@dont-email.me> <v4ha63$3v16r$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hfq9$2sdqr$5@dont-email.me> <v4hp3r$3viml$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hv85$3021v$1@dont-email.me> <v4ju8f$222a$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4k1m4$3f99u$1@dont-email.me> <v4k4mt$3fnqu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4maeo$3vv3f$1@dont-email.me> <v4mnim$1qt6$6@dont-email.me>
 <v4onga$hjo3$3@dont-email.me> <v4pbg4$ln46$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4rdtp$18al3$1@dont-email.me> <v4rvil$1boeu$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4s9hj$1dnm7$1@dont-email.me> <v4sa0h$1dk9i$3@dont-email.me>
 <v4sci6$1ebce$1@dont-email.me> <v4sd35$1eb2f$5@dont-email.me>
 <v4u3jl$1se49$1@dont-email.me> <v4umvh$1vpm0$7@dont-email.me>
 <v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:15:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3edc3033c9d2f90d2fdc1ea5e7f24e7";
	logging-data="2561619"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sCo7AHDruKLva/ORwg5n8"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:izlWxBhGHv03L3IPxmDKm56wVmc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3719

On 6/20/2024 12:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-06-19 13:37:53 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 6/19/2024 3:07 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>
>>> It is still unclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means.
>>> Which doesn't matter as nobody believes you anyway.
>>>
>>
>> It is dishonest to dismiss my reasoning out-of-hand without
>> finding an actual error.
> 
> So many of your errors have been found and analyzed that one more
> or less makes no difference.
> 

False assumptions on your part do not actually count as errors on my part.

>> For my first three examples that have no input H0 is a termination
>> analyzer.
> 
> Sitll inclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means.
> 

I really don't care what you believe.
It is not about belief.
It is about correct reasoning.

>> For my next example that has an input there is no existing
>> term of the art that exactly fits besides halt decider with a limited
>> domain or partial halt decider.
> 
> The latter is better.
> 
>> This is too confusing to my software engineer reviewers.
> 
> The cause of confusion is that you use common words in a way that
> is not compatible with their common meanings.

I am using the term: termination analyzer exactly correctly for the
first three inputs. I am targeting software engineers because they are
consistently more rational.

> If one cannot trust
> that you know what your words mean one cannot understand what you
> are trying to say.
> 
In other words your naysayer bias is holding you back from
understanding me. Bias is a systematic error.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer