Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:30:21 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66"; logging-data="1782351"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19snwpuuv/s0qaK5t/fy3a6" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:BRZfuYz3dl3hV3mkMrgisqzxmvw= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2526 On 6/25/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > > It might be true, but it is irrelevant, because the simulated H0 is > aborted prematurely. The simulating H0 aborts after two cycles, *I am not even talking about a simulating halt decider yet dumbo* If you can't begin to comprehend x86 emulators then our conversation is dead right here. For every x86 emulator Ho that can possibly exist at machine address 0000217a... _DDD() [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD) [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002182] 5d pop ebp [00002183] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated by H0 cannot possibly return. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer