Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Antonio Marques Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ????? Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 13:17:46 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 15:17:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95918979b0eaef84aa142724e8a647c4"; logging-data="381839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lLSUiZAPfomuexKSOVG8BlN+Q2/ccb51eSTLjljMWPA==" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lf4jg5k7ake7wtPerYBGADtIn5Q= sha1:OLOlLN8bNk81D0MpkVxOOwAQmlk= Bytes: 1882 Ross Clark wrote: > On 6/07/2024 7:51 a.m., Stefan Ram wrote: >> wugi wrote or quoted: >>> Not an explanation, but it seems like a demonstration of how English >>> likes to see things in "double" ;-) >> >> Out in the Golden State, folks toss around "null and void" in certain >> situations, maybe 'cause one word alone doesn't cut the mustard. >> - Another way how English likes to see things in "double" ;-) > > "Null and void" goes back to the 17th century. It's legal language, > which often likes to pair words like this, sometimes with subtly > different senses. Not ecclesiastical?