Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!snipe.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:13:14 +0100
Organization: Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <1qw3buo.1c8eok11a7wk0gN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
References: <v5t8mv$tk1f$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.40ecaac62ee523e7989d38@news.individual.net> <v5uo3h$15s3r$1@dont-email.me> <1qw1d8o.1r7d3jr1yb8l8eN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <v5vdu6$19tmo$1@dont-email.me> <1qw1nk1.54ugt713sk9k5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <v5vom6$1fa7i$1@dont-email.me> <1qw34z9.142wc8214trendN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <mn.131b7e87166f295b.127094@snitoo>
Reply-To: snipeco.1@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: snipe.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0fdafd00559cd5e279b4df3d7a29c6d5";
	logging-data="1920809"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lda5QMotLZSqVqsLOZrTe"
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.6b1 (ed136d9b90) (Mac OS 10.13.6)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/R/DaShZXoeSrttiDVXjzM7jvmA=
X-Tongue-In-Cheek: Always
X-Disclaimer: Any advice that I may give is worth only what I paid for it.
 This article comprises only my personal opinions unless otherwise stated.
 May contain traces of nuts.
X-Validate: All genuine Sn!peCo articles contain the header:
 "Injection-Info: snipe.eternal-september.org;" my registered FQDN.
X-Copyright: Copyright (c) 2024 Sn!peCo WWWB, All Rights Reserved.
 This article may be reproduced for the purposes of propagation and
 personal use only, no commercial use without express permission.
X-Face: 5<x+vv{"AHN,F~/dhf,X*~1zNv[TF/WUe(Uw.*ZOw\P'Ju]C6].T~7Z5cVjV\xTO6&)1#VQ
 iZ4vFDG
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett; WonK; Large Enid
Bytes: 3843

Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday or thereabouts, Sn!pe declared ...
> > Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/07/24 10:18, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>> Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
> >>>> On 02/07/24 06:47, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Nitpick:  I wrote none of the quoted material below.  [grump]
> >> 
> >> Sorry, my mistake.
> >
> > Thanks  :)
> >
>
> What /is/ the suggested protocol for responding to a post through 
> anther's followup?  Sometimes you can pop back and find the post you're
> responding to, but sometimes you can't, and sometimes you're think 
> you're going to respond to both authors but then you don't.
> 
> I would be tempted to change the attribution line to "Snipe quoted:" 
> because that respects the threading.  Would you prefer that the 
> attribution line is removed completely, but the quoted portions retain
> the full amount of guzintas?  Is there something else you recommend?
> 
> /dps
>

Anything that made it plain that my contribution had been omitted would
be fine with me.  When somebody's contribution is cut in its entirety I
would cut the relevant attribution too and substitute [...] in both
places as an indicator.  If it was only a partial cut I would leave the
attribution and put [...] where words were cut from the text.

Sometimes I'm lazy and cut all attribs. except the most immediate one.
That happens if I select a portion of text before hitting 'followup'.
In that case I'd put [...] between that single attrib. and the selected
section of quoted text.

It's probably a sign of OCD but I do prefer a tidy post.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.