Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory
Subject: Richard contradicts himself about infinite proofs
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:24:43 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <v6kutr$1og5r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v67685$6fr5$1@solani.org> <v6cpnc$1b3m$2@dont-email.me>
 <9e59212316a9b258e95a1de7f5cca46fee37861e@i2pn2.org>
 <v6csla$1otr$2@dont-email.me>
 <3f12eb90be522441c8b95d17d25767fcaf72ed2d@i2pn2.org>
 <v6cvqs$5vir$2@dont-email.me>
 <efced1648cf7ddc1c257d7c4369add3b391dd005@i2pn2.org>
 <v6d2r0$6cgn$2@dont-email.me>
 <931fe5b1e73d204bf20a268dd025489e3040371d@i2pn2.org>
 <v6e5ho$bbcb$2@dont-email.me>
 <0f3e40caf51b61ebb05c4ec2ae44042bff632017@i2pn2.org>
 <v6el1u$e6tb$1@dont-email.me>
 <3c9ef913b1fbbca50c1a4acd02401906646327ed@i2pn2.org>
 <RpKdnUjg8sjx0Bb7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <2d0b6260615af8afac79ee8de57bcd45c2f2056f@i2pn2.org>
 <v6fk9p$mr5k$1@dont-email.me>
 <8bd5f2159853ff17ef81b27a85141bccc324e7d9@i2pn2.org>
 <v6fkrb$mr5k$2@dont-email.me> <v6fl9a$mr5k$3@dont-email.me>
 <v6huj5$12ktu$2@dont-email.me>
 <7387a77d06e4b00a1c27a447e2744a4f10b25e49@i2pn2.org>
 <v6i08a$12ktu$4@dont-email.me>
 <c81e1794259853dfd7724900ebfab484679615be@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 05:24:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ca7ba779153ded89a6e04f3275941c5";
	logging-data="1851579"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RXX/jYDP7nb9IrxXTwFzv"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2I58xWOWOq25Bah+ZseQY7pBeUw=
In-Reply-To: <c81e1794259853dfd7724900ebfab484679615be@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2820

On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
> Tarski's x like Godel's G are know to be true by an infinite sequence of 
> truth preserving operations.
> 

"are *know to be true* by an infinite sequence"
"are *know to be true* by an infinite sequence"
"are *know to be true* by an infinite sequence"
"are *know to be true* by an infinite sequence"
"are *know to be true* by an infinite sequence"

On 7/8/2024 9:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > No, infinite "proofs" determine TRUTH, not knowledge.

*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*
*I am going to keep hammering you on this over-and-over*

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer