Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad
Subject: Re: phone migration
Date: 21 Jul 2024 04:05:01 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <lg3fndF7gruU6@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oogpi840u91p006@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7bus2$2j5p4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7cn13$rib$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7cn8u$2qi5v$2@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oohzeu59yq4p000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lfvrpdFl2sfU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v7gpku$30u1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7gqp2$3kern$1@dont-email.me> <lg2kusF3ldlU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7h7q8$45p8$1@solani.org> <v7h8ts$3mq5c$2@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oojrog77xreu003@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7ha0e$3mq7b$4@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oojs1w78h77k005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7hlpp$3o9o2$2@dont-email.me> <v7htgd$4fib$1@solani.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net T1dbaaNx+YH3ztwftAhPDQ6YpdOajWb0FB95GtrHfjgBhwFb2Y
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xsWGY+TA35XGycjPKbsCC5lUc3M= sha256:6Ax3l8yxWseqhmtksKNF7fGNCWEEiC3hy9zmZb6LzsM=
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM
 dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW<
 ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e
 up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
Bytes: 2619

On 2024-07-21, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-07-20 14:38, badgolferman wrote:
>>> 
>>> By the way, I appreciate that you are not rude and obnoxious like
>>> Jolly Roger.  It is far more pleasant conversing with you.
>> 
>> Well thank you.
>> 
>> But you should consider be more forthright about things you're wrong
>> about.
>> 
>> You said:
>> 
>> 'I wanted to know what he found objectionable so those specific items
>> could be addressed. '
>> 
>> I provided those specific things...
>> 
>> ...and you never replied on point.
>> 
>
> I never said *I* would address them, because I don’t have the
> technical knowledge. But they were addressed by others. 

Ever the coward.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR