Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:29:49 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com> <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="780d0488f191b6bc219a1abb43896eaa"; logging-data="2949440"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+728M4Guu798l7lWrwaADq" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-113-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cG90UfoOnDerLO1gc68W/5sTWUw= Bytes: 1473 bertietaylor wrote: > The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential > operator and an extra letter. > Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain. What it shows is a lack of understanding of mathematical notation, Arindam.