Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:58:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <e2958e7ea04d53590c79b53bfb4bc9dff468772b@i2pn2.org>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
	<97e0632d0d889d141bdc6005ce6e513c53867798@i2pn2.org>
	<v6sdlu$382g0$1@dont-email.me> <v6td3a$3ge79$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6tp1j$3imib$2@dont-email.me> <v6trdu$3irhh$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6tu01$3imib$11@dont-email.me>
	<a177dd76613794d6bb877c65ffe6c587a8f31bc1@i2pn2.org>
	<v6tvpv$3imib$14@dont-email.me>
	<091e8b7baeea467ee894b1c79c8943cb9773adb7@i2pn2.org>
	<v6u346$3khl8$1@dont-email.me>
	<16ac79611a441e7e01119631051f69119eee958a@i2pn2.org>
	<v6v06i$3pivt$1@dont-email.me>
	<23cb2d2401b87bf4f6a604aa1a78b93ffc9a29bc@i2pn2.org>
	<v6v2t1$3pmjn$3@dont-email.me>
	<3fc6548531f91ed14a27420caf9679a634573ed0@i2pn2.org>
	<v70lmo$61d8$1@dont-email.me>
	<8a6e6d9ff49aabe2525ce5729a439c807de4768a@i2pn2.org>
	<34Ocnd4voeWlDAn7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	<v725d7$hlvg$1@dont-email.me>
	<aa7643b6d8c46d2c4dd5ef92ae3650afe114adbb@i2pn2.org>
	<v734ct$mjis$2@dont-email.me>
	<056325e336f81a50f4fb9e60f90934eaac823d22@i2pn2.org>
	<v73gk2$obtd$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:58:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3409561"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:52:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/15/2024 9:04 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:23:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 7/15/2024 3:59 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:35:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 7/14/2024 10:02 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination of
>>>>> simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies
>>>>> non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>> It's just that the input HHH halts and does not need to be aborted.
>>> At the point that it is aborted it did need to be aborted
>> Because it hadn't halted yet?
> Because HHH has seen a repeating state that proves that DDD correctly
> emulated by HHH cannot possibly ever stop running unless aborted.
Which state is it that repeats forever? We know that HHH will abort.
What does HHH do with Fred's Finite_Recursion()?

> That you fail to understand a that there is a repeating state or fail to
> understand that a repeating state proves this is less than no rebuttal
> at all.
The state is in fact different in some internal decision logic that waits
for a repetition. You know this better than me. Can you point me to
where HHH looks for the stored state that may be repeated?

>> Why should it have halted, it will do so in the future. Do you place
>> arbitrary lifetime limits on all programs?

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.