Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 03:50:38 +0000 Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals) Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math References: <2e188e21-4128-4c76-ba5d-473528262931@att.net> <7d074e06-497a-4c38-9b34-fcded370ec75@att.net> <305754ad-bf86-44e7-95a5-f6059b8869da@att.net> <78CcnZMbf6XDzjT7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <41684a87-685c-446c-87ce-ce2f5fdfbd4d@att.net> <75fe3de0-9922-4a6e-8a4a-1df25bbc5cbc@att.net> From: Ross Finlayson Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 20:51:06 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <75fe3de0-9922-4a6e-8a4a-1df25bbc5cbc@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Lines: 47 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-KqNVPzBD5xASyuCTixcCRg1bfvNW5512/Anlljw3vzEHWXT1H7VB+GC/G4h6UchqfquZrou2sHTtL8K!l2VTJzjENgGHiU3/zTCV4a0Uc1f70w5IDL+OU13BNBB27ysXVMA1s/OGXWkIEyFhmgvu+NeoE9Hd X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3688 On 08/03/2024 08:45 PM, Jim Burns wrote: > On 8/3/2024 9:08 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 08/03/2024 12:08 PM, Jim Burns wrote: >>> On 8/2/2024 3:55 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>> On 08/02/2024 03:39 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: > >>>>> Then what *is* restricted comprehension? >>>> >>>> Usually it's just the antonym of >>>> expansion of comprehension. >>>> What I ask, >>>> if that you surpass, >>>> the inductive impasse, >>>> of the infinite super-task. > >>> I am more familiar with unrestricted comprehension >>> being the antonym of restricted comprehension. >>> >>> Unrestricted comprehension grants that >>> {x:P(x)} exists because >>> description P(x) of its elements exists. >>> >>> Restricted comprehension grants that >>> {x∈A:P(x)} exists because >>> description P(x) and set A exist. >>> >>> The existence of set A might have been granted >>> because of Restricted.Comprehension or Infinity or >>> Power.Set or Union or Replacement or Pairing, >>> but A would be logically prior to {x∈A:P(x)} >>> by some route. >> >> Geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's, >> is a classical theory, and it's constructive, >> there's only expansion of comprehension, > > I know what comprehension, restricted.comprehension, > and unrestricted.comprehension are by having seen > set axioms which were called Comprehension, > Restricted.Comprehension, and Unrestricted.Comprehension. > > What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets? > > What can you think it means.